What do you mean? Once a decision has been made to prosecute, either by filing a complaint or information, or by appealing a grand jury charge, government counsel must determine which charges to lay or recommend. If the conduct in question consists of a single offence or if there is only one applicable status, it is not a difficult task. As a general rule, however, an accused will have committed more than one offence and his or her behaviour may be prosecuted under more than one statute. In addition, the choice of royalties can be made more difficult by the fact that different statutes have different evidente requirements and provide for significantly different penalties. In such cases, special attention is needed to ensure the choice of royalties or royalties it needs. In addition to reviewing the concerns that led to the decision to proceed at trial, particular attention should be paid to the need to ensure that prosecutions are both fair and effective. Section 5K1.1 of the Criminal Guidelines allows the United States to enter a plea in the Correctional Court allowing the court to abandon itself to the stated instruction, on the basis that the defendant has provided significant assistance to the investigation or prosecution of another. The authority to approve these briefs is limited to the U.S. Attorney, chief assistant United States Attorney and supervisor Assistant United States Attorneys or a committee that includes at least one of these individuals. Similarly, for lawyers in the Department of Justice, the authority should be given to a section head or office head or to the assistant of such an official or committee of which at least one of these persons is a member.
What do you mean? Under federal criminal law, prosecutors have ample leeway to determine when, who, how and even if they should be prosecuted for a clear violation of federal criminal law. The prosecutor`s discretion in areas such as initiation or prosecution, the selection or recommendation of specific charges, and the end of prosecutions by accepting convictions have been recognized several times by the courts. See z.B. United States v.